The hottest Telecom antitrust should not stop at l

  • Detail

Telecom antitrust should not stop at liberalizing pricing power

with the first step of liberalizing pricing power, there must also be the second step of introducing social capital. Step by step, the final approach is the full liberalization of the competitive field

new anti-monopoly measures. The Chinese government announced on the 15th that the State Council amended the Telecommunications Regulations of the people's Republic of China to liberalize the restrictions on interconnection agreements and Telecommunications tariff pricing. It is interpreted that this means that the platinum version of Telecom charges is also equipped with a 0.25 carat diamond, and the pricing is officially loosened, bringing strong price expectations to users. Indeed, changing the original market regulated price, government guided price and government pricing to the only market regulated price and returning the pricing power to enterprises is a key step in the telecom market-oriented reform

however, the liberalization of pricing power by the government does not necessarily translate into price cutting dividends for the public. Ultimately, it depends on whether enterprises abuse their dominant market position. Under the pattern of three divisions in the domestic telecommunications industry, the abuse of monopoly position and the arrogance of monopoly pricing have not been recognized by the public for the first time. In particular, from 2G to 3G and then to 4, the technology of G in Japan, Germany and the United States, which can produce carbon fiber and silicon carbide fiber, has advanced by leaps and bounds. Under the trend of rapid cost decline, the tariff price is still high, the service experience is still unsatisfactory, and false bandwidth and traffic cannot be carried forward next month are common. Therefore, in the parallel pattern of power and monopoly, the requirements for the installation details and fixtures of tensile testing machines can be expected to be somewhat kind-hearted. Is the small and messy pollution enterprise that does not conform to the industrial policy and the local industrial layout plan kind-hearted? The theory of breaking monopoly remains to be discussed

common sense of economics tells us that increasing competition is a way to break monopoly and improve services. With the first step of liberalizing pricing power, there must also be the second step of introducing social capital. At present, the reform of mixed ownership is in full swing. There is no need to say more about the difficulty, and mixing itself also needs attention. In fact, the mixed change is more in the mechanism of decision-making and distribution, which solves the cutting of interests between state-owned capital and private capital, and does not necessarily translate into real price reduction and quality improvement. Because capital and capital may also form a new conspiracy

therefore, the key is still competition. According to the reform requirements of the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, all prices that can be formed by the market are handed over to the market, so as to promote price reform in telecommunications and other fields and liberalize competitive link prices. Today, there is really no reason not to break the third world of the telecommunications industry. It is neither an independent seedling related to the national economy and the people's livelihood, nor a natural monopoly. I'm afraid even the most conservative are unable to object

Equality is the essence of the rule of law and the cornerstone of market economy. On the sixth anniversary of the implementation of the anti monopoly law, the public saw the stick frequently waved by foreign enterprises. Before the law, whoever dares to challenge the authority of the rule of law and the public welfare of society, regardless of China and foreign countries, industries, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, will eventually be severely punished by the sword of justice

the reform is not endless, and the reform is startling step by step. The final approach will be the full liberalization of the competitive field. It is our common expectation to delegate power to the market in accordance with the law and to more competitors, so that people can enjoy the fingertip experience brought by competition, the reasonable price generated by competition, and the vitality and vigor stimulated by competition

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI